Summary of the Report: “The analysis of the work performed by the Inquiry Commission of the Parliament and of the information presented to the Commission regarding the elucidation of the actions of public authorities in relation to the incident at Pa[EN]
Sumarul raportului: „Analiza activităţii comisiei de anchetă şi a datelor prezentate privind elucidarea actiunilor autoritatilor publice cu referire la incidentul de la Pădurea Domnească”[RO]
Sumarul raportului: Analiza activitatii comisiei de ancheta si a datelor prezentate privind elucidarea actiunilor autoritatilor publice cu referire la incidentul de la Padurea Domneasca[RU]
Draft subject to public debate, developed by Sergiu Ostaf, observer
Summary of the Report:
“The analysis of the work performed by the Inquiry Committee and of the data presented regarding the elucidation of the actions of public authorities in relation to the incident at the Royal Forest reserve”
Introduction
This document is a summary of the report, and itcontains a brief presentation of the main issues that have been analyzed in detail in the report itself. The summarycontains an extract of the findings, conclusions and recommendations regarding: 1) the activity of the Inquiry Committee, 2) the actions of Moldsilva and the policy on hunting, 3) the Prosecution Office and investigation on the case, 4) police institutions and relevant actions, 5) the Superior Council of Magistracy, the Superior Council of Prosecutors, and their actions, 6) health authorities, 7) the Information andSecurity Service and its actions, 8) events of 23 December 2012, 9) Parliament actions following the presentation of the report of the Inquiry Committee.
The Inquiry Committee is an instrument of parliamentary control over the executive institutions and public authorities. The task of the Committee is to promote the public interest, which derives from the authority conferred to the Parliament.The political interests of the Committee members and their actions should be consistent with the public interest. The aimof the Committee is to facilitate the understanding of: a) what went wrong, b) why it went wrong, and c) what is to be done to make it work in the future? The conclusions and recommendations of the Committee shall specifically helpto implement concrete measures to remedy the causes that determined: 1) delayed investigation, with gaps in quality andstrong perception of distrust in the institutions that were responsible for conducting it; 2) systematic violations of thelegislation on hunting, state border, etc.; 3) the existence and perpetuation of the conflict of interest, subsequently the incompatibility with the position of a number of leaders of public institutions.
The detailed report is being finalized and shall be presented within reasonable time to the Parliament of Moldova and to the public opinion. The report presents 33 specific recommendations aimed at redressing the current situation.
